News|Articles|May 11, 2026

Vunakizumab Meets Primary Endpoint in axSpA

Fact checked by: Abigail Brooks, MA

Phase 2/3 China trial shows IL‑17A antibody vunakizumab rapidly improves radiographic axSpA symptoms vs placebo, with benefits lasting to 32 weeks.

A novel anti–interleukin (IL)-17A monoclonal antibody, vunakizumab, significantly improved disease activity in adults with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) compared with placebo at 16 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled adaptive phase 2/3 trial conducted across 38 hospitals in China, according to findings published in JAMA Network Open

The results add to a growing body of evidence supporting IL-17A pathway inhibition in r-axSpA, where secukinumab, ixekizumab, and the dual IL-17A/F inhibitor bimekizumab are already approved.2 Vunakizumab is currently approved in China for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis but has not received regulatory approval for any spondyloarthritis indication.¹

“In this randomized clinical trial of patients with r-axSpA, the 120-mg dose of vunakizumab provided significant improvement in signs and symptoms of r-axSpA at week 16, and these clinical benefits were sustained through week 32, with a manageable safety profile. Our findings support vunakizumab as a new treatment option for active r-axSpA,” investigator Jian Zhu, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China, and colleagues wrote.1

The seamless adaptive trial enrolled 548 adults aged 18 years or older with active r-axSpA meeting the modified New York criteria, defined by a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score of at least 4 and total back pain score of at least 4, and requiring an inadequate response or intolerance to at least 2 NSAIDs. Patients with prior exposure to 2 or more TNF inhibitors or any prior IL-17, IL-17 receptor, IL-23, or JAK inhibitor use were excluded. Approximately 36% of patients had received prior anti-TNF therapy. The mean (SD) age was 33.0 (8.9) years; 80.3% were male, and 91.5% were HLA-B27 positive.¹

The adaptive design proceeded in 2 stages. In stage 1, patients were randomized 2:2:1 to subcutaneous vunakizumab 120 mg, 240 mg, or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12; an interim analysis led the independent data monitoring committee to select 120 mg as the recommended dose for stage 2, in which patients were randomized 2:1 to vunakizumab 120 mg or placebo on the same schedule. The primary endpoint P value for the overall study was derived by combining stage 1 and stage 2 P values via the inverse normal method, with statistical significance set at a 1-sided threshold of P ≤ .025. From week 16 onward, all patients — including those initially assigned to placebo — received vunakizumab 120 mg every 4 weeks through week 32.¹

The primary endpoint — ASAS20 response rate at week 16 — was met. Among patients receiving vunakizumab 120 mg, 65.6% (193 of 294) achieved ASAS20 response, compared with 42.5% (62 of 146) with placebo (difference, 23.2%; 95% CI, 11.8%–34.0%; P <.001). Response was rapid: 34.0% of patients in the vunakizumab group achieved ASAS20 by week 2, versus 11.6% with placebo, and 48.6% versus 26.0% by week 4.¹

All prespecified secondary endpoints at week 16 favored vunakizumab, though these were not adjusted for multiplicity and P values should be considered nominal. ASAS40 response was achieved by 46.3% of vunakizumab-treated patients versus 24.0% with placebo (difference, 22.3%; 95% CI, 13.3%–31.3%; nominal P <.001), and ASAS5/6 response by 55.4% versus 22.6% (difference, 32.8%; 95% CI, 24.0%–41.7%; nominal P <.001). The number needed to treat for 1 additional ASAS20, ASAS40, and ASAS5/6 responder compared with placebo was 4, 4, and 3, respectively. Improvements in BASDAI (least-squares mean change, −2.6 vs −1.7; nominal P <.001), BASFI (−1.7 vs −0.9; nominal P <.001), BASMI (−0.4 vs −0.2; nominal P = .004), AS Quality of Life Questionnaire score (−4.0 vs −2.7; nominal P <.001), and SF-36 Physical Component Summary score (6.3 vs 3.6; nominal P <.001) all significantly favored vunakizumab.¹ In a post hoc analysis, the median ASDAS-CRP at week 16 was 1.7 (IQR, 1.1–2.2) in the vunakizumab group versus 2.6 (IQR, 1.9–3.2) in the placebo group.

Responses were sustained and deepened through the 32-week extension period. Among patients continuing vunakizumab, ASAS20, ASAS40, and ASAS5/6 rates at week 32 reached 77.0%, 62.2%, and 65.4%, respectively. Patients who crossed over from placebo to vunakizumab at week 16 achieved response rates at week 32 similar to those seen in the continuous vunakizumab group.¹

During the placebo-controlled period, overall adverse event (AE) rates were comparable between groups — 83.7% with vunakizumab and 81.5% with placebo. Serious AEs occurred in 1.0% and 0.7% of patients, respectively, and treatment-related serious AEs were rare (0 in the vunakizumab group, 1 in the placebo group). No deaths occurred during the study. Liver enzyme elevations were numerically more common with vunakizumab during the placebo-controlled period: ALT increases were observed in 14.6% versus 4.1%, and AST increases in 6.8% versus 2.1%. Hyperuricemia occurred in 12.6% versus 13.0% of patients, and COVID-19 infection in 12.2% versus 17.1%. No cases of severe infection, opportunistic infection, or malignancy were reported. Injection site reactions occurred in 4.8% of the vunakizumab group versus 2.1% with placebo.¹

Several limitations merit consideration. The trial was conducted entirely in China, limiting direct generalizability to Western patient populations, who differ in HLA-B27 prevalence, anthropometrics, and healthcare-setting practices. Secondary endpoints were not formally tested for multiplicity. The ASDAS-CRP analysis was post hoc. The study duration of 32 weeks does not allow conclusions about longer-term efficacy or safety, including inhibition of radiographic progression. Three of the 29 authors are employees of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, the study sponsor, which also funded the trial.¹

References
  1. Zhu J, Zhao C, Mi C, et al. Vunakizumab for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(5):e2611632. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.11632
  2. van der Heijde D, Gensler LS, Deodhar A, et al. Dual neutralisation of interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F with bimekizumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results from a 48-week phase IIb, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(5):595–604. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216752

Latest CME