
Treatment Choices and Sequencing in PsA, With Eric Ruderman, MD
Ruderman discussed recent research examining treatment choices after failure.
As therapeutic options in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) continue to expand, one of the most pressing clinical questions is no longer what to start, but what to do next. Treatment sequencing remains an area of active debate, particularly after biologic failure, where evidence is evolving but far from definitive.
At the
Recent data have begun to explore whether mechanism switching meaningfully alters outcomes after TNF inhibitor failure. Patients who stopped a TNF inhibitor due to inefficacy, rather than intolerance, may be more likely to benefit from targeting a different inflammatory pathway.3
Ruderman highlighted broader questions that remain unanswered. Why do some patients persist on therapy longer than others? Why do women, on average, appear to have shorter drug survival than men? Why do patients with non-radiographic axial disease show different persistence patterns compared with those with radiographic involvement?
Lastly, Ruderman touched on the long-standing pursuit of reliable biomarkers. Despite decades of investigation, no single marker has emerged to direct therapy in PsA. The future may lie not in one test, but in composite panels capable of capturing multiple inflammatory signals and disease domains, similar to multi-biomarker approaches used in other rheumatic diseases.
‘We've been looking for the right biomarkers for so many years. And every time something comes along, it sounds really great. It just doesn't pan out. So it's tough, and I don't think it's going to be 1 biomarker. I think it's going to be a panel of biomarkers that may help sort it out,” Ruderman said.















































































