
Opinion|Videos|September 5, 2024
Guiding Treatment Decisions: The Role of Remission Data and Head-to-Head Comparisons
Panelists discuss how head-to-head clinical trial data shape their treatment decisions, the significance of consistent remission rates across different patient populations, and the frequency with which remission data influence their choices to switch therapies.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- How do head-to-head data affect your treatment decisions?
- What does consistency of remission across patient types mean to you?
How often do you rely on remission data when considering switching therapies?
Advertisement
Related to this article

On World Arthritis Day, TOGETHER-PsA data and 3 rheumatology/derm experts frame GLP-1 agonists as a promising — but not yet proven — adjunct therapy.

At Week 52, ixekizumab plus tirzepatide sustained gains in skin clearance, joint response and metabolic measures versus ixekizumab alone.

Werth discusses what the 52-week AMETHYST Part A data add to the case for litifilimab in antimalarial-refractory cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Amplio Pharma now planning a phase 2a study after NovoBioJect raised intracellular active methotrexate levels by 38%.

The EC approved upadacitinib for active polyarticular JIA in children 2 years and older, based on phase 1 SELECT-YOUTH efficacy and safety data.

Amgen reported dazodalibep met its primary endpoint in the phase 3 OASIZ-301 trial, improving ESSDAI score in moderate-to-severe systemic Sjögren's disease.

Rozanolixizumab improved FIQR score at 10 weeks but did not reach 2-sided statistical significance on its primary BPI-SF interference endpoint.
Advertisement
Advertisement

